Exploring Magnetic Rotary Encoders: TMR and Hall Effect Technologies

A Comparison with Optical Encoders

Magnetic rotary encoders are known for their robustness, reliability, and suitability in harsh environments. In this article, we will delve into two prominent magnetic rotary encoder technologies: Tunnel Magnetoresistance (TMR) and Hall Effect. We will also compare their pros and cons with optical encoders.

Introduction to Magnetic Rotary Encoders

Magnetic rotary encoders utilize magnetic fields to detect the rotational position. Unlike optical encoders, which rely on light passing through coded discs, magnetic encoders are less susceptible to environmental contaminants such as dust, dirt, and moisture. They are also available in a wide variety of form factors, from compact (22mm outer diameter), low-cost ‘kit encoders’ to traditional shafted and even through-hole encoder options.

Tunnel Magnetoresistance (TMR) Technology

TMR technology is a recent advancement in magnetic sensing, operating on the principle of tunnel magnetoresistance. It offers high resolution and accuracy, low power consumption, and compact size, making it suitable for precise measurements and battery-operated devices.

Hall Effect Technology

Hall Effect sensors have been widely used in magnetic rotary encoders for decades. They generate a voltage perpendicular to the current flow when a magnetic field is applied. Known for their durability and reliability, Hall Effect encoders are used in various applications from automotive to industrial equipment.

Magnetic encoders are available in different sizes, configurations and even with different fundamental sensing technologies. This creates a broad portfolio of options for control engineers.

Comparison with Optical Encoders

Optical encoders are another popular type of rotary encoder that uses light passing through a coded disc to measure position. While optical encoders offer high resolution and accuracy, they have certain drawbacks when compared to magnetic encoders.

Pros of Optical Encoders

• High resolution and accuracy
• Excellent performance in clean environments

Cons of Optical Encoders

• Susceptibility to environmental contaminants
• Higher maintenance requirements
• Limited suitability in harsh environments

Conclusion

Magnetic rotary encoders, with TMR and Hall Effect technologies, provide robust and reliable solutions for measuring rotational position in various applications. While TMR encoders offer high resolution and accuracy with low power consumption, Hall Effect encoders are known for their durability and cost-effectiveness. When compared to optical encoders, magnetic encoders excel in harsh conditions but may compromise on accuracy. Ultimately, the choice of encoder technology depends on the specific requirements and environmental conditions of the application.

https://evrtp.com/product/posital-36mm-kit-encoder/

https://evrtp.com/product/posital-ucd-analog/

https://evrtp.com/product/posital-ucd-canbus/

https://evrtp.com/product/posital-ucd-ssi/